The Summer 2010 issue of Philosophia Christi
has some stimulating discussion at the intersection of philosophical theology and ethics.
(St. Andrews University), "Annihilationism, Traditionalism and the Problem of Hell."
Abstract: Logically consistent responses to the problem of hell are readily available. The Christian theologian should seek to go beyond these minimal criteria, providing a response that is also plausible and is harmonious with both Scripture and the tradition. In this paper I will examine annihilationism and two forms of traditionalism, assessing each view’s success not only in defending against the logical problem of hell, but also success with these additional criteria. I will suggest that a refined version of the traditional view best succeeds.
(SUNY Fredonia), "Hell, Threshold Deontology and Abortion."
Abstract: In this paper, I argue that Threshold-Hell Christianity conflicts with the pro-life position on abortion. The specific type of Christianity is that which also accepts threshold deontology and the existence of hell. Threshold deontology is the view that ordinarily moral duties consist of nonconsequentialist side-constraints on the pursuit of the good but that in some cases these side-constraints are overridden. My strategy is to establish that a person who brings about an abortion guarantees that the aborted individual goes to heaven and that it is morally permissible to guarantee someone goes to heaven. It follows that if Threshold-Hell Christianity is true, then abortion is morally permissible.
Read the full text of these articles by subscribing/renewing a subscription
to Philosophia Christi
Labels: 12:1, abortion, annihilationism, deontology, hell, philosophia christi